WAGD exhaust - removal of N2O and other gases from exhaust prior to atmosheric release

  • Thursday, April 24, 2025 12:13 PM
    Message # 13491416

    I seem to recall a conference over ten years ago where the topic of capturing gases in the WAGD exhaust prior to venting outdoors was briefly discussed. The purpose of this was to minimize possible greenhouse gas contributions.


    Does anyone have any experience or notes to share on this? One of my customers is talking about eliminating the piped N2O system for this reason. Before I take the meeting I want to see if there is another option to consider.


    Thanks


    Bob

  • Friday, April 25, 2025 9:26 AM
    Reply # 13491745 on 13491416
    Mathis Carlson (Administrator)
    There are a few types of systems out there for both anesthetic gas recovery as well as anesthetic gas destruction.

    We planned on having a presentation on gas recovery systems in Tampa before we had to cancel the conference. 

    While it is a little late for your meeting, that canceled Tampa presentation is scheduled for October in New Orleans.


    Long story short, there are systems available in the marketplace today that can capture or destroy anesthetic gases. 

  • Monday, April 28, 2025 5:46 AM
    Reply # 13492493 on 13491416

    There is a huge push to eliminate the piped N20 systems across the country.. I do not know how accurate the studies are but, some folks out west have determined that more than 80% of N20 used is "leaked through the piped system" before it ever gets to the patient??  At least that is what is being told to anesthesia groups. 


    I am currently in the process of decommissioning all piped N20 systems here at Advocate/Atrium - Charlotte.. The actual decommissioning of the system is not all that complicated - blank off all the outlets, turn off and relabel ZVB, disconnect and relabel master/area, pull tanks off manifold and label not in use. We are not removing the pipe system - the cost would be through the roof. 


    Anesthesia is not going to stop using N20, they are going to use E cylinders on back of the cart in-lieu of the wall. Where it gets complicated is determining how many extra E cylinders anesthesia will need, where are they going to be stored, who is going to move the cylinders when they need to be changed, at what point will they determine the bottle is "Empty" and change it, etc.? 


    I have our anesthesia groups simulate the decommission to make sure all of the new processes put in place work prior to turning off the system's. Although not a required gas, we did also reach out the local AHJ, to get their blessing's as well.. 


    Hope this helps, happy to share more if you need more info. 

  • Monday, April 28, 2025 8:56 PM
    Reply # 13492873 on 13491416

    Thanks, Mathis. Do you have any product names I might research? My meeting is this Thursday. Searching Google for anything regarding waste anesthetic gas removal/disposal just points to the need for a WAGD system, so I ran into a wall...




    Thanks Keith, your scenario sounds exactly like mine. As for "80% leaked through the piped system"? Who is stating this, I wonder? I would like to see the methodology used to determine this. 

  • Tuesday, April 29, 2025 5:51 AM
    Reply # 13492966 on 13491416
    Cary Darden (Administrator)

    I am working on a short data presentation to offer at a future MGPHO regarding this.  I am utilizing actual test data gleaned from annual verification testing over the past 10 years by filtering for test records for N2O on valves, alarms, manifolds and outlets and then futher filtering for any leaks within those individual test records.  Anecdotally we simply do not find that many leaks within that piped distribution system.  


    As far as leaks within the anesthesia machines and for how suppliers dispose of gas left in tanks returned not empty, I have no data on those items.  I imagine there are other portions of membership that could speak more intelligently to those items.  


    If anyone else is willing to share raw data (facility / company names are not included) for this study please reach out and let me know.  

  • Tuesday, April 29, 2025 7:45 PM
    Reply # 13493292 on 13491416

    Thanks all for commenting, I am looking forward to reviewing this information and discussing this in person in New Orleans.


    I glanced at the last attachment Cary provided (practicegreenhealth) and stopped when it stated "The recommendation is to quickly transition to using E-cylinders at the point of care rather than a highly inefficient piped system."


    That organization seems to have a slightly different understanding of how efficient the piped nitrous oxide system actually is than I do.

16339 Kranker Drive, Stilwell, KS 66085

mgpho@me.com